Response is always a choice. The work to be done depends heavily on self awareness. It is their prefixes that make all the difference. The essential distinction between being proactive vs. reactive is the difference between responding and reacting. Remember, you respond reflexively to a sudden intense light by blinking your eyes or by papillary contraction. We find ourselves led by the mind, instead of leading it ourselves. Being proactive vs. reactive is to break this chain of automatic causation. Perhaps you find yourself powerfully proactive under certain circumstances, yet hopelessly reactive in others? Change in Informal Organization : Informal organization is a must in every formal organization and is a very important part of our existence because many of our motivational forces find satisfaction in these relationship. Proactive changes occur when some factors make realize organization think over and finally decide that implementation of a particular change is necessary. While reactive changes respond to immediate symptoms, procative changes address to underlying forces creating symptoms. Fig. If we want our future to be different from our past, if we want to grow and change in new and exciting ways - proactivity best become a cornerstone of our lives. The essential distinction between being proactive vs. reactive is the difference between responding and reacting. Change in Formal Organization Structure : The formal organization structure establish a form and line of command of authority and responsibility in an organization. Yet how we choose to relate to life is always within our power. Sudden death of a CEO, the resignation of the executives holding key positions, loss of major suppliers, a drastic cutback in budget and civil disturbances are the examples of unforeseen crises. 4. The revolutionary change in communication technology, i.e., communication satellite, cable networking, dish antenna, etc., compelled the Doordarshan to restructure itself by segmenting its services to different categories of viewers and become more competitive. 6. ♦ The economic inter-dependence among countries has become more apparent. V. Krishnamurty of SAIL, Tapan Mitra of INDAL, Ratan Tata of Tata Sons are the examples how the change in leadership led to internal changes in these organizations. Reactive change covers a limited part of the system but procative change co-ordinates the various parts of the system as a whole. If we want to replace reaction with response we need to be mindful. After all, life is meant for living - conscious living. Consequently when management likes to introduce any change that disturbs the informal relationship established among people there is bound to be a state of imbalance. 3. However, this doesn't mean it's time to accept our lot and resign ourselves to 'this is just the way things are.'. Respond to circumstance - and you are in control of yourself instead. Each stage culminates in a crisis (which Greiner calls 'revolution'), which the organization must overcome before graduating to the next stage. 2. Response is always a choice. Reaction is past conditioning within us - expressing itself now. Having to endure the mind isn't leading it. Awareness of the reactive tendencies of the mind is brought to the fore - where we can deal with it directly. When we react we create problems both for ourselves and for others. We can't control everything in our lives nor do we need to. We find ourselves walking our karmic path to life change - consciously this time. For examples, the computerisation of the Examination Division of the M.K. Reaction is automatic and ruled by habit. 9.2: Five Phases of Organizational Growth. We create some. Being proactive vs. reactive - do we really have a choice? Here, we are mentioning some of the most common and obvious external reasons of organizational change : 1. Does it just happen, or do we consciously need to invite it into our mind and into our lives? 1. It doesn't feel good to know we aren't choosing to benefit ourselves or others. Developing self awareness we become increasingly able to control our reactive patterns. This is essential since we can't work with something that we can't first 'see'. Reactivity, rather, has taken over the show. He feels irritated when change occurs in methods and procedures of work of which he is accustomed to. Change in People Requirements : Customers dictate organization what they actually require. All Rights Reserved. We create some distance from the happenings of the mind - and in this space we enjoy the many benefits of being proactive - the freedom from living compulsively. As an example of the difference, assume that a hotel executive learns about the increase in the number of Americans who wa… Copyright© 2016, Evolutionary Pathways®. When we lead, it is the mind that has to endure us for a change. This is because responses are tailored to circumstance; while reactions are triggered by it. Academic library - free online college e textbooks - info{at}ebrary.net - © 2014 - 2020. Yet  endurance isn't the whole picture of life now is it? Though there may be a host of internal factors that may also cause change in Organizations, some of the illustrative ones are listed here : Leadership changes culture and values in the organizations. Obviously, your's this action would involve coordination of central nervous system and psychomotor capacities. Griner's five phases of organizational life are shown in the following figure. Undoubtedly, your's this is an automatic and instant response to a force (intense light) without giving any thought. As human beings pass through certain sequential stages of life-cycle, so do the organizations also. Proactive changes (planned changes). ♦ The drive for social equity has gained momentum. Most likely you find yourself both proactive and reactive to various degrees. Competition : The present time is the survival of the fittest. An example will help you distinguish the two changes in more clear manner. University affected other aspects as well, such as reporting relationships, span of control, coordination mechanism and so on. To be at the receiving end of the mind often means we are made to endure. For initiating planned change, the manager needs to constantly watch the changes taking place in the external and internal environment of the business so that corrective measures are taken accordingly and the changes could be effected successfully. 3. Being proactive vs. reactive is to break this chain of automatic causation. If there is a change in this formal organizational structure, there will be a change in the formal relationship which creates disequilibrium. For example, establishing a new department, e.g., the Department of Business Administration may cause the creation of teaching and non-teaching positions, budgeting allocation, building construction etc. Companies that take a proactive approach to change are often trying to avoid a potential future threat or to capitalize on a potential future opportunity. 2. With changing requirements of customers, the five-star-hotels have, of late, started to offer new services, such as business centres, conference hall facilities, secretarial services, etc. Change in Managerial Personal : Change in the managerial personal in the organization may result in disequlibrium. A personnel may retire or change place or may be appointed afresh, this will all affect the policies, practices, procedures and programmes of the organization and the people are to adjust themselves accordingly. Reactive change covers a limited part of the system but procative change co-ordinates the various parts of the system as a whole. Change in Business Conditions : Changes in business conditions such as change in the quality of the product, change in the marketing system or practices, business cycles, change in industrial policy etc. React to circumstance - and you are controlled by circumstance. We must become aware of our reactive tendencies if we are to shift from reactive to proactive thinking. The more we aim to be proactive, the more we come up against reactivity within. It's no coincidence that the word reaction is made of two parts 're' and 'action' - indicating an action repeated. In a class, there are 30 students and the teacher explains the concepts to all of them. The difference between reactive and proactive changes can made on the basis of behavioural angle.

Jackson County Inmate Mail, Rebrilliant Prep Table, Jackson County Inmate Mail, Salvation Army Store Near Me, Rebrilliant Prep Table, World Of Tanks Blitz Premium Tank Recovery, Rose Gold And Burgundy Decorations, 2017 Mazda 3 Preferred Equipment Package, Philips 9003 Led, Mi4i Combo Display Price,